The Economic Impact of Child Labor in India
Child labor is more than just a social issue—it’s an economic story shaping India’s future in 2025.
While millions of children should be in classrooms, many are found in factories, farms, and small workshops. This hidden workforce may fuel short-term profits, but it silently drains productivity, stunts innovation, and traps families in poverty. From Bihar’s brick kilns to Delhi’s garment units, the impact is nationwide.
Understanding how child labor affects India’s economy isn’t just important—it’s essential to building a stronger, fairer future.
Let’s explore the effects of child labor on the Indian economy and future workforce. Learn how it impacts growth, education, and productivity, and discover actionable solutions.
What are the Effects of Child Labor on India’s Economy and Future Workforce in 2025?
India has set ambitious goals for growth, innovation, and human development. Yet child labor—often hidden in homes, farms, workshops, and fragmented supply chains—continues to drain productivity, depress wages, and lock families into poverty.
In 2025, the economic costs of child labor in India remain real and measurable. Lost schooling translates into lower lifetime earnings, lower tax receipts, weaker productivity, and higher social spending later on.
In this article, you will learn how child labor in India impacts the country’s economy and future workforce in 2025. Let’s explore statistics, case studies, and solutions shaping growth, education, and social progress.
Quick definitions
- Child work can include light, age-appropriate tasks that don’t harm health or schooling (for example, limited household chores).
- Child labor is different: it includes work that is too young, too long, interferes with schooling, and/or is hazardous to health, safety or morals. That’s the definition used by UNICEF and the ILO worldwide.
- Indian law: The Child and Adolescent Labour (Prohibition & Regulation) Act (as amended in 2016) prohibits employment of children under 14 in all occupations and restricts adolescents (14–17) from hazardous work—with limited exceptions for non-hazardous “family enterprises” and artistic work. These exceptions are contentious because they can blur lines between learning and exploitation.
Child Labor in India 2025: How Big Is the Problem?
In 2025, child labor in India remains widespread, spanning industries from agriculture to manufacturing, affecting millions of children and creating long-term economic and social challenges.
- Global context: After two decades of decline, global child labor rose again, reaching ~160 million children—nearly one in ten—amid and after the pandemic. New updates in 2024–25 put the figure around 138 million as methods and time windows differ, but the bottom line is sobering: millions are still in hazardous work.
- India’s estimates are notoriously tricky because the last national census was in 2011. Newer analyses triangulate labour surveys with schooling data: a 2024 UNICEF Innocenti study, using 2018/19 survey data and internationally aligned definitions, estimates 1.8–3.3 million children in child labour (0.7–1.3% of 5–17-year-olds). That’s a conservative range; hidden, home-based, and seasonal work are hard to measure.
- Rescues and enforcement offer a window: India’s PENCIL (No Child Labour) portal coordinates complaints and rescues nationwide; the National Child Labour Project has been merged into Samagra Shiksha to mainstream rescued children into schools. States routinely report rescues, but reporting is uneven. In 2025, for instance, Delhi reported a 51% rise in child-labour rescues year-on-year; civil-society analyses rank Telangana, Bihar, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Delhi among top rescuing jurisdictions, underlining persistent demand in urban and peri-urban informal work.
Bottom line for 2025: India has tools and laws in place, but prevalence likely exceeds what official counts capture—especially in home-based units, small workshops, seasonal agriculture, and subcontracted supply chains.
The economic mechanics: how child labor in India drags growth
Child labor in India may offer short-term savings for employers, but it weakens education, reduces productivity, and traps India’s economy in low-skill cycles that block long-term growth.
1) Lower lifetime earnings → lower GDP and tax receipts
Every year of quality schooling tends to raise adult earnings by roughly 9–10% on average (a global evidence base often used by Indian planners).
When children work instead of learning, those returns vanish—shrinking their lifetime incomes and future tax contributions. At scale, that’s a drag on GDP.
The World Bank quantifies the macro impact of learning losses (not only child labor) as potentially cutting national income growth by ~2.2% per year for the affected cohort—illustrating how missed learning compounds across decades.
2) A less skilled workforce → lower productivity and slower structural transformation
Child labor in India is both a cause and a consequence of under-development: it suppresses skill formation, keeps firms in low-productivity niches, and reduces incentives to adopt technology.
Economists have documented this “low-skills trap,” where reliance on cheap, unskilled labor dampens innovation and formalization.
India’s transition from informal, low-value work to higher-value manufacturing and services is slower when a share of future workers miss foundational skills.
3) Intergenerational poverty and higher social spending later
Early labor is linked to worse health and learning outcomes, which correlate with lower lifetime productivity and greater need for public spending on remediation, health, and social protection.
Recent global analyses of violence against children—which includes hazardous child labor—estimate annual economic costs in the tens of billions of dollars worldwide.
The logic applies in India too: when injuries, stunting, or trauma reduce capacity to learn and work, both families and the state pay later.
4) Distorted local labor markets
Widespread child labor in India can depress adult wages in local markets by increasing labor supply at the low-skill end. That, in turn, keeps household incomes fragile and consumption weak—dampening demand for higher-quality goods and services. Over time, this can reduce tax buoyancy and municipal revenues that fund urban services and infrastructure.
Where child labor hides: sectors and geographies that matter for the economy
Child labor often clusters where value chains are long and compliance is uneven:
Home-based and piece-rate manufacturing in Delhi-NCR, Firozabad (UP), Jaipur (Rajasthan), Sivakasi (TN) and clusters across Maharashtra and Gujarat. Bangle-making in Firozabad, for instance, involves extended families and home-based tasks with low margins and high health risks. Children’s participation keeps unit costs low but at the expense of schooling and safety. In 2024–25, reporting again spotlighted low wages and risks in such clusters.
Construction and brick kilns attract seasonal migrant families (Odisha to Telangana/Andhra is a well-documented corridor). Enforcement actions in Telangana during 2024–25 show both the scale and the possibility of swift prosecution, but also how easily children get pulled in during peak season.
Agriculture and allied work, including cottonseed operations in Gujarat and parts of Rajasthan/Telangana, have a history of child involvement in sowing, weeding, and seed sorting under subcontracting arrangements. These tasks spike seasonally and can look like “helping” but meet child-labour definitions when they’re long, hazardous, or replace schooling.
Extractives and niche materials: mica scrap collection in Jharkhand has been under sustained scrutiny because the mineral flows into global cosmetics and electronics supply chains. A 2024 US Department of Labor study tracked risks and remediation initiatives in the mica chain, underscoring why robust due diligence by buyers matters for India’s export image.
Plantations: In Assam tea gardens, studies and rights groups continue to document child vulnerability—linked to poverty, service deficits, and migration histories—which can draw adolescents into work during school terms or holidays. This matters for a sector that anchors local economies and exports.
Fireworks in Sivakasi (Tamil Nadu): Recurrent accidents, including in early 2025, have highlighted unsafe conditions and subcontracting that complicate inspections. Even when factories hire adults, home-based pre-processing can involve adolescents, especially around peak seasons. Beyond human costs, each accident disrupts supply, raises insurance and compliance costs, and tarnishes the “Make in India” brand.
Schooling is the economic firewall—and India’s progress is uneven
India’s universalization of elementary education and the PM-POSHAN (mid-day meal) programme keep children in school by lowering the cost of attendance and improving nutrition.
PM-POSHAN was extended through 2025–26, and states continue to tweak coverage and menus. Where coverage is high, it stabilizes school participation—particularly for poorer households.
Learning levels, however, are a constraint:
- ASER 2023 (“Beyond Basics”) shows that many 14–18-year-olds struggle with foundational tasks (reading, arithmetic, applied skills). When adolescents lack basics, the opportunity cost of schooling feels high to families—and work becomes the default.
- National assessments in 2024 also flagged stubborn arithmetic gaps at the middle-school level—important because numeracy underpins vocational learning and employability.
UNICEF’s 2024 India-focused analysis recommends remedial education, teaching at the right level, and bridge courses for out-of-school and working children—approaches that India’s Samagra Shiksha now emphasizes.
These are among the highest-return education investments for preventing child labor and reclaiming human capital.
The macro picture: what child labor costs the Indian economy
It is impossible to pin a single rupee number on the cost of child labor in India in 2025 without fresh census-grade data. Still, the direction and channels are robust:
- Income and productivity losses: Using conservative international returns to education (≈9–10% per additional year), even one lost year per child has sizable present-value costs when aggregated. Multiply that across millions of children and you erode future GDP growth, formal-sector tax bases, and the quality of the workforce.
- Slower structural change: Economies move up the value chain when firms adopt technology and workers bring skills. Research consistently shows that high child labor prevalence slows this upgrade, keeping regions stuck in low-value-added, compliance-risked niches. India’s push for higher manufacturing GVA and exports is less effective if supply chains rely on the very low-skill segments that child labor supports.
- Higher social costs later: Hazardous child labor contributes to injuries and chronic conditions that reduce lifetime productivity and increase health and social-protection outlays. Global estimates put annual costs of child-hazard work alone in the tens of billions of dollars; India’s share would be material given its population and sectoral patterns.
- Brand and export risk: International buyers in apparel, leather, gems, fireworks, carpets, and specialty minerals increasingly screen for child-labor risk. Documented risks in clusters like mica (Jharkhand) or home-based glass (Firozabad) can trigger trade friction, buyer exits, or pricier audits—which ultimately reduce margins and the competitiveness of MSMEs.
Micro to macro: case studies across India (and what they tell us)
From Delhi’s workshops to Bihar’s brick kilns and Jharkhand’s mica mines, case studies across India reveal how child labor reshapes economies, livelihoods, and futures
Delhi-NCR: rescues surge with supply-chain pull
In 2025, Delhi reported a 51% jump in child-labor rescues compared to 2024, with many children trafficked from poorer states and found in small units (garments, repair shops, eateries) or as domestic workers.
Each rescue is a human story—but collectively they show how urban demand and fragmented subcontracting pull children into the city economy, especially during festival and sale seasons.
The costs: poorer schooling continuity for migrants, depressed low-end wages, and reputational risk for brands sourcing from the region.
Rajasthan & Uttar Pradesh: crafts, gems, and home-based work
A civil-society review of 27,000+ cases highlighted Rajasthan among top states for rescues, and flagged high-risk sectors like spas, placement agencies, and home-based manufacturing.
Meanwhile in Firozabad (UP)—the bangle hub—reporting through 2024–25 again pointed to low wages and health risks, and continued reliance on family-based piece work that can involve adolescents.
The economic paradox: these clusters generate livelihoods yet remain stuck in low productivity because they over-use unskilled family labor (including children), minimizing incentives to mechanize or move upmarket.
Bihar: migration, trafficking, and hidden work
Bihar remains one of the largest source states of child labour in India. Poverty, seasonal migration, and weak local job opportunities push families to send children to work.
Many are trafficked to Delhi, Punjab, and Rajasthan for domestic work, agriculture, and small workshops. Within Bihar, children are often found in brick kilns, roadside dhabas, and agricultural fields, especially during peak seasons.
NGOs in districts like Gaya and Nalanda report that lack of secondary schools and safe transport contributes to dropouts, feeding the labour supply.
Economically, Bihar loses twice: children miss education that could lift household earnings, while remittance-driven survival strategies trap families in low-income cycles.
Investments in rural schools, seasonal bridge education, and safe migration support are key to breaking this pattern.
Assam & North Bengal: plantations and poverty
Tea estates underpin local economies but have historic service deficits. Recent studies and baseline surveys (2024–25) spotlight education and nutrition gaps for workers’ children, making adolescents vulnerable to work—particularly during plucking seasons.
Investments in school access, transport, and nutrition (e.g., PM-POSHAN menus adapted to local diets) are economic levers here. They keep adolescents in school, raise future productivity and reduce turnover costs for estates.
Jharkhand: mica’s global supply chain scrutiny
A 2024 study for the U.S. Department of Labor mapped the scrap-mica chain and child-labor risks in Jharkhand, with recommendations for remediation and buyer due diligence.
For India, the economic message is clear: clean supply chains attract better buyers and prices; dirty ones face audits, cancellations, or discounting—costs that cascade to communities.
Telangana: brick kilns, migration corridors, and faster prosecutions
Migrant families from Odisha to Telangana fill brick-kiln jobs; during Operation Muskaan (July 2025), hundreds of children were rescued from kilns, workshops and street work across multiple districts—underlining the seasonal nature of demand.
Telangana’s Anti-Human-Trafficking Unit has also achieved quick convictions in select cases, signaling deterrence when enforcement is consistent.
Economically, reliable prosecutions raise the expected cost of using child labor—pushing firms toward safer, more productive practices.
Tamil Nadu (Sivakasi): fireworks volatility
A string of accidents (including Feb 19, 2025) exposes how subcontracting and home-based pre-processing complicate safety oversight.
Even where factories hire adults, family-linked piece work may involve adolescents. Each incident brings production stoppages, legal liability, and insurance spikes—and heightens buyer caution.
Smarter mechanization and transparent vendor lists reduce both safety and reputational risk.
Education policy is economic policy: what the latest research says
The UNICEF Innocenti 2024 India report is explicit: remedial education, teaching at the right level, and bridge courses for out-of-school youth are among the most effective levers to reduce child labor in India and lift learning.
India is already scaling some of these under Samagra Shiksha; the returns, in economic terms, are high because they convert at-risk adolescents into productive, higher-earning adults.
Meanwhile, PM-POSHAN (mid-day meals) reduces the direct cost of attendance and supports nutrition for learning.
The Union government extended the scheme to 2025–26, and states like Haryana and Andhra Pradesh have announced enhancements (coverage during drought, protein supplements, school nutrition gardens). For the economy, this is human capital infrastructure—as critical as roads or power.
Why ending child labor is a growth strategy (not just a moral goal)
Put simply, ending child labor in India raises productivity and speeds structural change:
- It shifts labor from unregulated, low-productivity niches into schooling and later formal employment, raising per-worker output.
- It rewards firms that invest in technology and skills (because they can’t undercut with cheap child labor), pushing clusters up the value chain.
- It improves export readiness by reducing reputational and compliance risks in global markets (a growing requirement under importers’ due-diligence laws).
- It increases tax revenues over the medium term, because higher earnings in adulthood generate more personal income tax, GST through consumption, and corporate taxes as firms formalize.
Global modeling exercises suggest that eliminating child labor delivers significant gains in growth and incomes; while figures vary by method, the direction is unequivocal and highly relevant to India’s 2030 targets.
Frequently overlooked: urban child labor and the services economy
Discourse often focuses on agriculture and small factories, but urban services also absorb children: eateries, delivery assistance, repair shops, salons, and domestic work.
The work is often hidden (e.g., domestic settings), difficult to inspect, and paid in cash.
Policymakers should treat urban child labor as an economic productivity problem, not only a policing issue:
- Children working long hours in services forgo skill accumulation just when India’s services sector needs digitally savvy workers.
- Municipal business licensing and inspections can integrate child-labor red flags (e.g., hours, tasks unsafe for adolescents), paired with referral pathways to schools and bridge programs.
- Urban skilling missions should reserve slots and stipends for older adolescents (15–17) who return to education and need flexible, modular learning to catch up.
What works on the ground (with Indian examples)
- Targeted enforcement + fast prosecution: Telangana’s AHTU case that went from rescue to sentencing in ~10 months shows deterrence is possible with coordinated policing, labour, and child-welfare systems. So, set targets for time-bound charge-sheets and trials in child-labour cases under the 2016 Act.
- Bridge schooling & “Teaching at the Right Level”: UNICEF-backed evidence and India’s own practice show remedial and bridge courses re-integrate out-of-school children effectively—especially when coupled with stipends and mid-day meals. States should ring-fence budgets inside Samagra Shiksha for these because the returns are high and the intervention is time-bound.
- Social protection where migration is seasonal: Brick-kiln corridors need portability of entitlements (PDS, health insurance) and on-site schooling/creches during migration season. So children aren’t pulled into work. Enforcement should focus on contracting chains, not just kiln front gates.
- Supply-chain due diligence in clusters with export exposure: In Jharkhand’s mica and Firozabad’s glass, buyer partnerships fund community schooling, safe transport and third-party monitoring. This reduces risk and improves brand value. Encourage cluster-level certifications tied to district child-labour-free plans.
- Strengthen PM-POSHAN as an economic lever: States like Haryana and Andhra Pradesh are adding protein or running summer kitchens in drought—steps that keep attendance steady and reduce seasonal dropout. Therefore, link PM-POSHAN kitchens with School Nutrition Gardens and local procurement to improve cost-effectiveness and community support.
- Use PENCIL better: The PENCIL portal is a powerful complaint-to-rescue system. Public dashboards, district-wise KPIs (time to rescue, rehab status), and automatic school-enrolment triggers for rescued children would improve outcomes and accountability.
What businesses can do (and why it pays)
Map subcontractors down to home-based units. Publish supplier lists for higher-risk product lines; require age-verification and safe-work protocols for adolescents (14–17) where lawful.
Tie purchase orders to compliance and fund community schooling & bridge programs in sourcing villages (especially in export-exposed lines like mica, glass trinkets, fireworks components, embroidery).
Adopt tech for traceability (QR batch-level tracking, secure wage payments) to minimize reliance on cash-based piece work that hides exploitation.
Measure ROI: firms that exit child-labour-risked subcontracting often see fewer disruptions, better buyer access, and higher unit prices. The 2024 mica study and 2025 news around fireworks safety show how risk events impose real financial costs.
Actionable Solutions to End Child Labor in India
Ending child labor in India requires urgent, practical actions. From stronger enforcement to education support and business accountability, these solutions can transform lives and boost economic growth.
For Government (Union & States)
Tighten the “family enterprise” exception: Define strict time caps, ban tasks that are unsafe in home-based settings, and require school-attendance verification to prevent misuse. Update hazard lists to reflect home-based processes (chemicals, glass dust, fireworks pre-processing).
District-level “Child-Labour-Free Growth Compacts”: In high-risk clusters (Jaipur crafts, Firozabad glass, Sivakasi fireworks, Jharkhand mica), sign 3-year compacts linking MSME incentives (power tariff rebates, credit) to verified child-labour-free supply chains and community schooling targets.
Scale bridge schooling with results-based financing: Allocate Samagra Shiksha funds to bridge programs with bonuses for retention and grade progression of rescued or at-risk adolescents. Pair with PM-POSHAN enhancements (protein days, deworming, school nutrition gardens) to keep attendance steady.
Data and transparency: Publish district dashboards from PENCIL: complaints, rescues, prosecutions, mainstreaming status, and time-to-action metrics. In addition, use randomized inspections in urban services and home-based units, not just factories.
Migration-aware services: In seasonal corridors, ensure portable PDS, anganwadi linkages, on-site learning camps, and creches—so work is never the default childcare plan.
For Business & Industry Bodies
Zero-tolerance procurement with deep mapping (to household subcontractors), backed by independent monitoring and worker hotlines.
Community investments in schooling where you source—scholarships, bicycles for girls, bridge classes—are supply-chain risk management, not charity.
Digitize piece-rate chains: cashless payments, batch QR codes, and attendance logs make it harder to hide child labor and easier to pay adults fairly.
Reward clean suppliers with longer contracts and price premiums; it’s cheaper than crisis management after exposés.
For Civil Society & Cities
Ward-level vigilance for domestic and small-unit work; partner RWAs with the Labour Department and CWCs.
Help lines + referral loops: ensure every complaint routes to PENCIL and triggers a school re-enrolment plan within 7 days.
Teen-friendly catch-up routes: evening learning centres, open-school credits, and short vocational modules that count toward a diploma.
For Households
Enrol and keep children in school—look for PM-POSHAN, free textbooks, uniforms, and scholarships.
If you migrate seasonally, ask your contractor and local administration about on-site learning camps and creches; complain via PENCIL if children are being hired.
The payoff: growth, equity, and India’s demographic dividend
Eliminating child labor in India is not only a rights imperative; it is smart economics.
India’s demographic dividend depends on every child acquiring the literacy, numeracy, and life skills to participate in a modern economy.
The evidence is plain:
- Each additional year of quality schooling raises earnings markedly.
- Learning recovery and bridge programs work.
- Nutrition in schools keeps children attending.
- And clean supply chains command better prices and market access.
The costs of inaction—lost earnings, weaker productivity, reputational damage—are far higher.
A hopeful outlook—and concrete next steps for 2025
India has the tools, the policies, and the partners to end child labor in India faster:
- Name the hotspots and sign Child-Labour-Free Growth Compacts in each.
- Fund bridge schooling at scale—with clear targets and public dashboards.
- Turbocharge PM-POSHAN with protein days and summer kitchens in drought-hit blocks to prevent seasonal dropout.
- Digitize the last mile of supply chains and pay adults fairly.
- Prosecute swiftly where violations persist, and celebrate districts and clusters that demonstrate clean growth.
Ending child labor is an investment whose returns compound for decades: higher skills, higher earnings, higher tax revenue, and a more innovative economy.
When a child stays in school today, India’s GDP tomorrow grows a little faster—and the dividend is shared more widely. That’s the kind of growth story worth writing.
Read Here: Social Dynamics of Gig Economy Labor in the 21st Century
Conclusion
Child labor in India is not just a moral concern—it is an economic roadblock.
In 2025, while some industries still rely on underage workers for cheap labor, the long-term costs outweigh the short-term savings.
Every child taken out of school weakens the nation’s future workforce, lowers productivity, and limits innovation.
Case studies from Bihar, Delhi, and Jharkhand reveal a clear pattern: child labor traps families in poverty and slows India’s economic progress.
Ending it requires a united effort—stronger laws, strict enforcement, accessible education, corporate accountability, and community awareness.
When children learn instead of labor, they become skilled contributors to the economy.
By investing in their future today, India secures sustainable growth, global competitiveness, and a more equitable society tomorrow.
Child labor’s end is not only possible—it is essential for India’s economic destiny.
Read Here: Income Inequality and Its Impact on Social Mobility
